These pages are taken from sources that are assumed to be public domain.  If any copyrighted material is contained within these pages, please notify the webmaster at gregs@tampabay.rr.com and those pages will be removed immediately.

 


The following document is a legal opinion regarding public use of the beaches of Florida, and whether or not adjacent land owners can deny public use of sandy beaches on, or near, their property.


MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA

INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM

TO:   Marshall L. Wilcox    

DATE:   March 15, 1999

County Commissioner, District 1

    

FROM:   Michael A. Rodríguez   

FILE:   leg99m.265

Assistant County Attorney

SUBJECT:   Bathtub Beach "No Trespassing"      

REF:   e-mail, 16:09:44

Signs      March 12, 1999

ISSUE

We have received your inquiry concerning the status of "No Trespassing - Private Property" signs located on the beach portion near the northern property line of Bathtub Reef Beach Park. This question raises the following issue: Whether the owner of a beach front parcel can restrict general public's access to the sandy area of the beach?

ANALYSIS

A beach front parcel owner CANNOT restrict the access of the general public to the sandy area of the beach. The Supreme Court of the State of Florida held, in the case of City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc., 294 So.2d 73 (Fla. 1974), that:

The beaches of Florida are of such a character as to use and potential development as to require separate consideration from other lands with respect to the elements and consequences of title. The sandy portion of the beaches are of no use for farming, grazing, timber production, or residency -- the traditional uses of land -- but has served as a thoroughfare and haven for fishermen and bathers, as well as a place of recreation for the public. The interest and rights of the public to the full use of the beaches should be protected.

Id., at 77.

With these interests in mind the Court stated that:

If the recreational use of the sandy area adjacent to mean high tide has been ancient, reasonable, without interruption and free from dispute, such use, as a matter of custom, should not be interfered with by the owner. However, the owner may make any use of his property which is consistent with such public use and not calculated to interfere with the exercise of the right of the public to enjoy the dry sand area as a recreational adjunct of the wet sand or foreshore area. . . . . This right of customary use of the dry sand area of the beaches by the public does not create any interest in the land itself. Although this right of use cannot be revoked by the land owner, it is subject to appropriate governmental regulation and may be abandoned by the public. (Emphasis added)

Id., at 78.

The placement of poles and signs by the owner of the beach front parcel constitutes an interference with the "exercise of the right of the public to enjoy the dry sand area." Bathtub Reef Beach Park has been at that location since 1983. The public has used the sandy area of the beach to access the other public beach access several feet to the north of the private beach front parcel. This use has been "ancient, reasonable, without interruption and free from dispute" until the erection of the poles and signs. The public, however, may not trespass landward of the dunes. But access to the sandy areas cannot be interfered with by the private property owner. The rights of the owner of the dry sand area may be compared to rights of a part-owner of a land-locked nonnavigable lake, as described in the case of Duval v. Thomas, 114 So.2d 79 (Fla. 1959).

The lifeguards at Bathtub Reef Beach Park may instruct those patrons that access is allowed over the sandy area adjacent to mean high water mark. The Parks and Recreation Department may also wish to erect signs as to this effect, informing the public that walking on the sand north of the park area does not constitute trespassing.

MAR

cc:   Board of County Commissioners

Russ Blackburn, County Administrator

Randall H. Reid, Deputy County Administrator

Daniel D. Hudson, Assistant County Administrator

Gary K. Oldehoff, County Attorney

Robert Denison, Parks and Recreation Director

 


These pages are taken from sources that are assumed to be public domain.  If any copyrighted material is contained within these pages, please notify the webmaster at gregs@tampabay.rr.com and those pages will be removed immediately.

BACK